2008’s remake is a nearly shot-for-shot effort, not unlike Gus Van Sant’s misunderstood “Psycho” rant from 1998.
In 2005, Gus Van Sant told an interviewer about his shot-for-shot 1998 remake of "Psycho," "You can't copy a film.
The new film, which had its United States premiere on Wednesday night at Sundance, is not quite a shot-by-shot, line-by-line facsimile, in the manner of Gus Van Sant's "Psycho."
"Funny Games" doesn't seduce you with conventional storytelling and character development and then turn them around on you -- like, say, Alfred Hitchcock's " Rear Window " and "Psycho."
This isn’t like Hitchcock having another crack at “The Man Who Knew Too Much,” as he did after an interval of twenty-two years, and conjuring a very different result; it isn’t even like Gus Van Sant reheating “Psycho” in color, as he did in 1998; it’s like Hitchcock himself shooting “Psycho” all over again, in 1970, somewhere off an Autobahn outside Graz.
No matter how much the ad campaign promises "come see the torture!" this was ever only going to be a film for the art house crowd; I certainly don't know, but I expect most of the people who have seen the new film also saw the original at some point, and are motivated by curiosity, not unlike Gus Van Sant's Psycho from 1998 (a film that's really a terrible analogue for Haneke's remake, the more you think about it).