(The mission's detail also pales compared to the masterful storytelling of "Zero Dark Thirty.")
Unlike Kathryn Bigelow’s Zero Dark Thirty , Berg’s film doesn’t dare ask its audience to weigh the same moral considerations that trouble its characters, and that closing montage, in all its tear-stained, echoing-rock-guitar ludicrousness, is there to give us an emotional escape route.
One of the problems with a movie like this is that there is a general lack of women–none, in fact–which does keep it truthful to that world of Navy SEALs, but when you compare a movie like this to something like last year’s “Zero Dark Thirty,” it feels like the whole is more like that film’s macho climax rather than being more even and balanced.
The impact of this effort is considerable, which is not to say we don’t need more nuanced and inquisitive films about Afghanistan such as “Restrepo,” Sebastian Junger and Tim Hetherington’s 2010 documentary about Army troops in that country, or “Zero Dark Thirty,” Kathryn Bigelow’s study in moral ambiguity in the hunt for Osama bin Laden.
Writer-director Peter Berg’s battle-heated “Lone Survivor” follows the searing D-Day beach landings of Steven Spielberg’s “Saving Private Ryan,” the edge-of-destruction bomb-defusing in Kathryn Bigelow’s “Hurt Locker” and intense dramatization of the hunt for Osama bin Laden in “Zero Dark Thirty,” another war film directed by Bigelow.
This isn't a complex movie like 2012's excellent Zero Dark Thirty; instead, it's a straightforward look at four Navy SEALs and their efforts to stay alive during an ill-fated reconnaissance mission to Afghanistan in 2005.