Not to be mistaken for a sequel to the Sandra Bullock drunk drama "28 Days," Danny Boyle's "28 Days Later..." is more a remake--or a nod to, or let's be honest here and call it a complete rip-off--of George A. Romero's apocalyptic horror masterpiece "Dawn of the Dead" (a superior sequel to his 1968 nightmare "Night of the Living Dead").
Unlike the monsters in classic zombie films like 1968's "Night of the Living Dead" and the throwaway copycats that followed, these aren't lumbering, mumbling zombies -- these are twitching, hissing zombies.
With their rotting flesh, blood-red eyes and snarling, spewing, clawing fury, the “infected” owe a debt to zombies of the genre launched by George A. Romero three decades ago with “Night of the Living Dead.”
Sure, the movie's creators have swiped most of their ingredients, from premise to casting to aesthetics, from George Romero's famous zombie trilogy, beginning with Night of the Living Dead (made in 1968, another catastrophic year in global life and political relations); the new film warrants praise for its effects even if it loses points for uniqueness.
And unlike George A. Romero's Night of the Living Dead and sequels, these zombies can really move.
If you read Alex Garland's best-selling novel The Beach, you'll remember its jarring climax, which seemed like a cross between The Bacchae and Night of the Living Dead (1968).