-- this really doesn't yet quite qualify, at least as far as the horror genre goes) a full decade after " Scream 3 " (which Craven directed but Williamson did not write).
Still, it's an improvement on the disgraceful "Scream 3." Torture porn may have gotten serious traction at the box office in the last decade but Craven is clear that such bloody body modification has no place in his ironic micro/meta slasher movie.
Let me be more specific In spirit and in ideas, “Scream 4” bears the strongest resemblance to the first installment (in moments it feels like a direct sequel to it), rather than a continuation of where “Scream 3” ended.
"Scream 3," in 2000, was more overtly comedy-oriented and less scary.
Craven also toys with texting and vlogging that weren't invented when Scream 3 debuted, several months after The Blair Witch Project made slasher conventions obsolete except in remakes.
That perception of freshness could come from the fact that it has been 11 years since “Scream 3” was released, but in my opinion there’s much more to it than that.