"Cars 2" is a loud, obnoxious, carnival ride of a movie whose only redeeming value is that its merchandise sales - the chief reason for its existence - might help the studio fund three or four more worthy projects down the road that will be on the level of "Up" or "Finding Nemo" or your pick of the "Toy Story" movies.
Of all the many and mostly wonderful Pixar films, the 2006 “ Cars ,” with the possible exception of “ Up ,” is my least favorite – although the second half of “ Wall-E ” lost me, and the image in “ Ratatouille ” of all those supposedly cute rats pouring through the kitchen of a high-end French restaurant ranks right up there for me with the shower scene in “Psycho.”
The studio is coming off one of its best stretches— Up and Toy Story 3 have both been instant classics—while the studio's signature director, John Lasseter, is back for the first time in several years, as well.
The truths it proffered to its audiences about hard work and friendship were pretty standard ones, lacking the complexity offered in knottier, more involving fare concerning family ties and growing up and growing old, such as the " Toy Story " films and " Up ."
Sure, the film is designed for kids, but with a growing number of Pixar films that feature mature subject matter (the opening scene in UP) as well as sophisticated characters (Wall-E), the slapstick humor, shallow relationships, and flat-out bizarre thematic take-aways in Cars 2 seem like a significant step backward for Pixar.
I would argue that it’s a bit stronger than that — its Route 66 mythology, coupled with the presence of Paul Newman in what would turn out to be his final role, lends it a nostalgic, bittersweet tinge — but when placed alongside the magnificence of, say, Up or the Toy Story trilogy, it clearly doesn’t possess the same emotional or artistic wallop.