The supposed action blockbuster doesn’t even belong in the same class as the likes of “ Spider-Man " and “ X-Men ,” because even though Ang Lee’s psycho-dramatic portrayal of the big green machine is certainly a unique direction to take, it’s ultimately not what the fanboys were expecting.
They're an odd match: the comic book scribe extraordinaire (creator of "The Hulk," "Spider-Man," "X-Men," "Daredevil" and many others) and the director of a string of finely-crafted but diverse films (from "The Wedding Banquet" and "Sense and Sensibility" to "Ride With the Devil" and "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon").
The best comic-book movies — Tim Burton’s “Batman,” the Catwoman sections of “Batman Returns,” and Bryan Singer’s first “X-Men” — sprang from heroes who were working out their childhood traumas and the pain of being “different.”
For that matter, the simple passage of time helped Lee's film out quite a lot, for even though the 12-years-and-counting superhero boom has one continuous history that makes it feel somewhat like a single moment (2000's X-Men , which kicked off the whole trend, feels "contemporary", in a way that 1997's Batman & Robin very much does not, n'est-ce pas?), the state of the comic book movie in 2003 is not even a little bit like the state of the comic book movie in 2012.
Hulk is no exception, and it's going to leave many a Spider-Man or X-Men fan disappointed.
Those accustomed to the thrills of “Spider-Man” or the chills in the “X-Men” series will find very little of those qualities in “Hulk.”