Showgirls (1995)
Directed by Paul Verhoeven
Fresh to Las Vegas with no connections, Nomi Malone takes a job as an exotic dancer. Her talents are quickly noticed by Cristal, a headlining dancer who senses an opportunity to bolster her own act. But Nomi won’t play second fiddle and soon begins her venomous path to the top, ruthlessly backstabbing anyone who gets in her way.
19 connections found
View:
19 films that influenced Showgirls
What critics say influenced Showgirls
Eszterhas and Verhoeven probably thought they were making a New Age "All About Eve."
More specifically, as has been widely observed, it's All About Eve with strippers and a much more caustic sense of nihilism (which is actually pretty impressive, given Eve's sterling nihilism credentials): wide-eyed innocent, Nomi Malone (Elizabeth Berkley) arrives in Vegas looking to be a Star! and gets her chance under the mentorship of grande dame Cristal Connors (Gina Gershon), the headliner of a major new topless revue.
It's " All About Eve " with some new touches: The star doesn't break a leg, but gets a compound hip fracture, and is philosophical about her fate because her lawyers negotiated a big settlement.
Unimpressed that Joe Eszterhas cribbed copiously from All About Eve and 42nd Street, viewers don’t even stop to address the notion that he and Paul Verhoeven—who most of the auteurist crowd have given a pass to by this point, but it doesn’t matter because Showgirls exists outside of and beyond auteurism—are directly commenting on these star-is-born pipe dreams and their culpability in force-feeding the American Dream to an audience of pop junkies.
And though much has been made about how extensively researched "Showgirls" is, its entire dramatic shape is lifted from previous films, with great chunks of everything from Eszterhas' own "Flashdance" to "All About Eve" to the Busby Berkeley-choreographed "Forty-Second Street" periodically crashing down on the proceedings like boulders.
In this licentious "All About Eve" fable, nude dancer Nomi Malone (newcomer Elizabeth Berkley) elbows and scratches her way to the top of the nudie heap, while stripper queen Cristal Connors (Gina Gershon) alternately tries to keep her down and seduce her.
(I’d love them to try to digest the notion that a third major influence is Jean Renoir’s French Cancan.)
Decades after 1967’s Valley of the Dolls and decades prior to 2016’s The Neon Demon, Dutch director Paul Verhoeven‘s Showgirls, the over-the-top tale of ill-gotten fame, busted dreams and the skeezy, grimy underbelly of Las Vegas, dragged its garish arse across screens across the world.
There are also some noteworthy theories, such as the one that considers Showgirls to be part of a camp trilogy that also includes 1967’s Valley of the Dolls and 1981’s Mommie Dearest .
Two of them were written by Joe Eszterhas, and they are satires of the prurient/prudish American obsession with making everything about sex except for sex: Basic Instinct and Showgirls , and the writer wasn't in on the joke at all.
Paul Verhoeven never made a better film after that, opting for profit-taking fare like Basic Instinct and Showgirls .
He solidified his position three years later with the Arnold Schwarzegger vehicle "Total Recall," and then entered American film lore forever with his two sexy sleazefests "Basic Instinct" and "Showgirls."
Director Paul Verhoeven ("Total Recall," "Basic Instinct," "Starship Troopers," "Showgirls") situates the story in a near-future Detroit (but filmed in Dallas) that has been overrun by criminals and in the process turned over to a private company, the OCP (Omni Consumer Products), for policing.
I found plenty to like even in his perpetually lambasted, and criminally misunderstood Showgirls.
The application of such movie-making elegance to this sub-moronic drivel imparts a sour, almost punitive quality to the picture, similar to the way in which Verhoeven films like “RoboCop” and “Total Recall” periodically taunt you with blasts of sickening violence, as if to say: “This is what you came for.
Advertisement
If Verhoeven and Eszterhas (the Erectile Duo) asked me the same question, I'd show them two videos to shut them up: "Don't Look Now," which contains the gentlest, most fumbling and naturalistic (and therefore hottest) lovemaking scene ever put on film, and any Astaire-Rogers musical, whose romantic dance numbers remain more erotically expressive than anything in "Showgirls."
Then again, what else could one expect from Joe Eszterhas, the screenwriter of Showgirls and Jade, and Paul Verhoeven, the director of Robocop and Total Recall?
Basic Instinct is the most European of the director's U.S. pictures - in fact, it feels awfully like a re-working of the themes of his 1983 thriller The Fourth Man , only re-aligned to specifically screw with American viewers - and while it is surely not his best work, it feels a hell of a lot more like the films that Verhoeven made without Eszterhas than the films that Eszterhas made without Verhoeven; though it is perhaps not surprising that it feels most of all like a practice run for their next collaboration, the notorious 1995 flop Showgirls , an absolutely tremendous satire that is, um, like I said.
If you are familiar with Eszterhas' work (Sliver, Jade, Showgirls ), you know how redundant and verbose that sentence was.
Since his 1987 "RoboCop" became a hit, he has steadily cheapened his talent by directing such witless trash as "Total Recall" and "Basic Instinct," another Eszterhas winner.
The last time screenwriter Eszterhas worked with director Verhoeven, the two of them came up with Basic Instinct, an effective if nonsensical vehicle for Michael Douglas's sex-paranoid White Guy and Sharon Stone's supercool, omnisexual psycho bitch.
The film, as scripted by one of the most appalling misogynists in 1990s Hollywood, is the standard-issue backstage melodrama plot from the 1930s transposed into the world of Las Vegas showgirls: and as much as I want to say that Verhoeven snatched everything brilliant about the movie away from Eszterhas, as was clearly the case with Basic Instinct , I cannot shake the feeling that, given how important the wholesale adoption of every shopworn cliché in the book is to the film's total effect, that we might actually be looking at Eszterhas grown into some degree of self-awareness, just in time for his career to implode.
What comes out of all this is an earnestly produced potboiler version of A Chorus Line, with dry humping.
The plot is a cross between A Star Is Born and A Chorus Line and, even with all the nudity, virtually anyone from Vincente Minnelli to Russ Meyer could have turned in a more watchable end product.
Advertisement
Unimpressed that Joe Eszterhas cribbed copiously from All About Eve and 42nd Street, viewers don’t even stop to address the notion that he and Paul Verhoeven—who most of the auteurist crowd have given a pass to by this point, but it doesn’t matter because Showgirls exists outside of and beyond auteurism—are directly commenting on these star-is-born pipe dreams and their culpability in force-feeding the American Dream to an audience of pop junkies.
Yes, Showgirls is a clear riff on the likes of 42nd Street and its descendants, but one of its most notable thematic arcs comes in the form of the Stardust’s shows.
This new set is most definitely aimed at adults eighteen and up who can accept the film and the package's contents for what they are--sleazy nonsense.One can't help comparing "Showgirls" to the much-earlier "Myra Breckinridge," they're both so dreadful, but at least "Breckinridge" was meant to be bad.