Jurassic Park (1993)
Directed by Steven Spielberg
A wealthy entrepreneur secretly creates a theme park featuring living dinosaurs drawn from prehistoric DNA. Before opening day, he invites a team of experts and his two eager grandchildren to experience the park and help calm anxious investors. However, the park is anything but amusing as the security systems go off-line and the dinosaurs escape.
26 connections found
View:
26 films that influenced Jurassic Park
What critics say influenced Jurassic Park
The film's ersatz moral, about the dangers of tampering with nature, harks back to The Lost World (1925) routed through King Kong (1933) and Island of Lost Souls (1932), though there's more soul to be found in any Kong close-up than in this film's overplayed reactions.
The film's ersatz moral, about the dangers of tampering with nature, harks back to The Lost World (1925) routed through King Kong (1933) and Island of Lost Souls (1932), though there's more soul to be found in any Kong close-up than in this film's overplayed reactions.
The techniques developed for and during the making of the film are relevant even to later technologies; the CGI dinosaurs of 1993’s Jurassic Park were originally intended to be animated in stop-motion, and the techniques originated by Willis O’Brien have been instrumental in the development of digital animation (5) .
This is the granddaddy of Spielberg's Jurassic Park and a myriad other science fiction/fantasy/horror films that rely on special effects; thus, it makes the short list of required films to see.
Jackson is potentially the next Spielberg, and King Kong is his Raiders , E.T. and Jurassic Park rolled into one.
Many rip-offs, one remake (Dino DeLaurentis' campy 1976 version ), and films like Jurassic Park have come and gone.
"King Kong" is the father of " Jurassic Park ," the " Alien " movies and countless other stories in which heroes are terrified by skillful special effects.
Because they looked strange and unworldly compared to the slick, utterly convincing effects that are now possible, they were more evocative: The effects in movies like “ Jurassic Park ” and “ Titanic ” are done so well, by comparison, that we simply think we are looking at real things, which is not quite the same kind of fun.
And of course like many of the influenced directors of his ilk, Spielberg adds his fine touches as nods to his favorite films such as the gigantic wooden entrance in to the wilderness in “King Kong,” “The Valley of Gwangi,” and even “Psycho” gets a wink from the master.
Advertisement
If anything, science has closed the gap from the impossible to the merely improbable in the 20 since this movie reminded us of “When Dinosaurs Ruled the Earth.”
Since Willis O'Brien first used stop motion photography to animate the dinosaurs in the 1925 version of "The Lost World," cinemagicians like O'Brien and Ray Harryhausen have attempted to realize "Jurassic Park's" effortlessly believable vision of the vanished giants that once inhabited the earth.
Spielberg has always been a master of pacing (see Jurassic Park), and Jaws is no exception.
"Jaws" does seem a little slow in comparison to equivalents today like Spielberg's relentlessly noisy but influential, " Jurassic Park ".
The beasts look real - certainly more realistic than the giant mechanical shark of Spielberg's ''Jaws" - and they are used more judiciously.
The dinosaurs are fearsome creatures, just like the menace that made "Jaws" such a hit.
After “Jaws,” where every bit of effects work had been a notorious creative concession, it made him giddy to be able to craft a creature feature the way he pictured it in his head.
He learned the hard way in Jaws (1975), whose mechanical shark tended to sink to the bottom of Nantucket Sound as often as it perform its on-screen duty, that sometimes delaying the fulfillment of audience desire for just the right amount of time is key to making a thrill ride soar.
You’d think that might be a hindrance, but not here: The same way that Raiders of the Lost Ark was partly an homage to the action serials of an earlier age, so too was Jurassic Park an homage to the creature features and monster movies of Spielberg’s youth.
Like other Spielberg smashes (Jaws, E.T. and Raiders of the Lost Ark), Jurassic Park became a theme-park attraction — a machine to stoke awe and fear, in its audience and its maker.
No other director, alive or dead, is as good at pacing adventure films for maximum tension, awe, and satisfaction, and while Jurassic Park is not as great a film as Raiders of the Lost Ark or Jaws, it may Spielberg’s best realization of this fundamental trait.
Of course it’s a classic, but it’s not like Spielberg’s other adventures like “Jaws” or “Raiders of the Lost Ark,” which were released when I was quite young.
Spielberg was no stranger to big box office having launched three essential 1970’s and 1980’s juggernauts, Jaws, Raiders of the Lost Ark and E.T.
On the other hand, they're not necessarily what a killer shark movie or a swashbuckling matinee adventure are for, and Jaws and Raiders of the Lost Ark both benefit immeasurably from the tender loving care obvious in every frame.
The covert hostility he's shown toward this type of popcorn material ever since the critical failure of "The Color Purple" and "Empire of the Sun" dashed his hopes of graduating to "serious" themes is largely absent from "Jurassic Park," except for some wry, slyly subversive jabs at the lawyers and licensing departments that have become such a negative force in contemporary mass entertainment (thanks to merchandising-obsessed filmmakers like Steven Spielberg, of course).
Spielberg is genuinely ruthless in his thrills, and he saves some of the film’s most traumatizing moments for Tim and Lex, thus making them fraternal brother and sister to Spielberg’s other cinematic children who have faced and survived (maybe) the horrors of the world (both real and fantastical) in Jaws, E.T. (1982), Poltergeist (1982), and Empire of the Sun (1987).
Spielberg's career is littered with extremely well-managed child performances: from Close Encounters of the Third Kind to Empire of the Sun to A.I. Artificial Intelligence .
The covert hostility he's shown toward this type of popcorn material ever since the critical failure of "The Color Purple" and "Empire of the Sun" dashed his hopes of graduating to "serious" themes is largely absent from "Jurassic Park," except for some wry, slyly subversive jabs at the lawyers and licensing departments that have become such a negative force in contemporary mass entertainment (thanks to merchandising-obsessed filmmakers like Steven Spielberg, of course).
Certainly it's better than monster hits like Jurassic Park or self-important films like Amistad.
The big-budget follow-up to the successful Jaws (1975), which became the number one box office hit of all-time, by Steven Spielberg ("Jurassic Park"/"War of the Worlds"/"E.T.
There's also the deep curiosity that drives people to extremes, as he showed in "Close Encounters of the Third Kind."
Think back to another ambitious special effects picture from Spielberg, " Close Encounters of the Third Kind " (1977).
But Spielberg has clearly outgrown this kind of basic chase material, and his boredom shows in shots, sequences and story points that have been recycled from "Jaws," "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" and "Raiders of the Lost Ark."
Spielberg's career is littered with extremely well-managed child performances: from Close Encounters of the Third Kind to Empire of the Sun to A.I. Artificial Intelligence .
Industrial Lights and Magic, the premiere special effects house of the '80s and '90s, was born as a result of Star Wars, and its manifest contributions to the industry have included everything from making the Starship Enterprise fly to breathing life into the dinosaurs of Jurassic Park .
The nighttime T-Rex attack might be the finest f/x set piece ever filmed, and that's coming from a died-in-the-wool Terminator fan (and you can throw all six Star Wars on the keeper pile, too).
Nor did he go the more elaborate, indeed twisted, route of his pal George Lucas , who in 1997 released versions of the earliest Star Wars films that updated the visual effects, changed elements in a few scenes and, in the process, outraged the movies’ most devout, possessive admirers.
Unlike George Lucas’ shameful frequent re-releases of the Star Wars properties, a twenty year absence seems the perfect period of dormancy for a film like Jurassic Park to seem as fresh as it did when it was originally released.
With an all-star technical team, many of whom have pushed then envelope before in such juggernauts as Star Wars and Terminator 2: Judgment Day, Spielberg has wondrously implanted the highest strains of science fiction within the supple body of a very human story.
Advertisement
The plot is equal parts "Westworld" and (believe it or not) "Jaws 3-D."
The set-up is just chilling enough, a variation on a theme Michael Crichton worked earlier in his film "Westworld," about a high-tech amusement park that turned lethal for its customers.
The story itself is a recycling by novelist Michael Crichton, who has taken his 1973 film "Westworld," about a Western theme park taken over by rebellious robots, and substituted flesh-and-blood dinosaurs, generated from prehistoric DNA strands, for the villains.
This week: the failed theme park of Michael Crichton's 1990 novel Jurassic Park finally opens for business in Jurassic World , with the expected results.
Michael Crichton infuses H.G. Wells prophecy with Invasion of the Body Snatchers for a cold-eyed analysis of breakdown, from which Coma and Jurassic Park were to be reaped.
At its heart, Jurassic Park is a revenge-of-nature cautionary tale, a latter-day descendent of the rash of ’70s horrorshows that followed in the wake of Alfred Hitchcock’s The Birds (1963) and found its apotheosis in Spielberg’s Jaws, which effectively scared an entire generation out of the ocean.