Whereas the film itself is all unexpected dimensions and unsettling excesses, with the ambiguous fulfilment of Pupkin's dream frighteningly echoing the news-headline coda of Taxi Driver.
Martin Scorsese and Robert De Niro form one of the most creative director-actor teams in American film history, having made half a dozen landmark works together, including “Mean Streets,””Taxi Driver” and “Raging Bull,” which form sort of a trilogy.
It's hard to believe Scorsese made it; instead of the big-city life, the violence and sexuality of his movies like " Taxi Driver " and " Mean Streets ," what we have here is an agonizing portrait of lonely, angry people with their emotions all tightly bottled up.
Which is a shame, because it's Scorsese's second greatest film, after "Taxi Driver."
Martin Scorsese's 1983 movie about an aspiring comic (Robert De Niro) who kidnaps a talk-show host (Jerry Lewis) is clearly an extension of Taxi Driver—both in its themes of obsession and its ambiguous stylistic mixture of fantasy and reality (it's impossible to tell where one ends and the other begins—my feeling is that the entire last half of the film takes place in the De Niro character's mind).
Certainly no one connected with Taxi Driver ever again reached such heights (or plumbed such depths), although Albert Brooks became a significant filmmaker in his own right, while Scorsese and De Niro would come close with Raging Bull and The King of Comedy?two movies that equal or surpass Taxi Driver in every way except as the embodiment of the historical spirit.