Exploiting the narrative possibilities of time travel on a more vigorous and elaborate scale than its relatively self-enclosed predecessors, “Genisys” effectively returns us to the events of James Cameron’s “The Terminator” (1984), stirs in the buddy-Arnold dynamics of “Terminator 2: Judgment Day” (1991), borrows the man-machine-hybrid plot device from McG’s “Terminator Salvation,” and more or less pretends that Jonathan Mostow’s “Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines” (2004) never happened (“never happened” being an admittedly unstable concept in this particular universe).
Still, it’s better than “Terminator 3” (or “Terminator Salvation,” if you really want to count that one), and it’s good to see Arnold Schwarzenegger reprise one of his signature roles.
There are some neat ideas, including folding in iconic moments of the first two films in the series in interesting ways, but Terminator: Genisys lacks a suitable villain, a gripping story befitting its supposed status as the true spiritual Terminator 3, and frequently misses the point of what makes the first two, good, Terminator films tick.
Drawing on plot threads from previous movies (particularly 1984’s The Terminator and 2003’s Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines), and incorporating familiar characters played by newly minted actors, Genisys weaves a convoluted (and ultimately nonsensical) time travel story about evil robots from the future who have been manipulating history since the 1970s in order to ensure that a certain event – the robot uprising – occur by a certain date.
Terminator Genisys had an easy task to accomplish: don't turn out like Terminator 3: Rise Of The Machines or Terminator Salvation (sequels that didn’t live up to James Cameron’s first two films).
Considering all the sequels, I thought director Jonathan Mostow ( Breakdown , U-571 ), and a cast headed by Claire Danes, packed the most entertainment value into Terminator 3 .