More so than other films about the US space program, including " The Right Stuff " and " Apollo 13 ," it makes the experience seem more wild and scary than grand, like being in the cab of a runaway truck as it smashes through a guardrail and tumbles down the side of a mountain.
The film distinguishes itself from other space epics, such as Ron Howard’s space-program love letter Apollo 13, with Chazelle’s dogged insistence on filming much of the action from Armstrong’s perspective.
The movie succeeds thanks to director Damien Chazelle’s superb visuals, which land somewhere between the quiet indie look of his previous flick, “La La Land,” and the epic sweep of “Apollo 13.” Space has never looked so sexy, or felt so claustrophobic.
The 1950s - 70s heyday of the United States’ manned space program has been a relatively successful (if strangely infrequent) source of compelling cinematic stories, inspiring both rousing dramas (The Right Stuff [1983], Apollo 13 [1995]) and engrossing documentaries (For All Mankind [1989], In the Shadow of the Moon [2007]).
Una vez arriba, suspendido a la merced de las fuerzas naturales (con “Isaac Newton en el asiento del piloto”, como diría el Jim Lovell de Tom Hanks en Apollo 13), Chazelle nos presenta mejor a su protagonista, un hombre que en cualquier otra cinta pronunciaría en este momento alguna línea “de guion”, como sucede en aquella de Ron Howard.
We knew that Tom Hanks, as astronaut Jim Lovell, would survive a catastrophic mishap and make it home alive in Apollo 13—just as we knew that Hanks would safely ditch his plane in the Hudson River as an airline pilot in Sully.