Much like 1995’s Babe , Buck is given humanistic traits (physical reactions, expressions, etc) that often push the boundary of believability (at one point he convinces Harrison Ford’s gruff, isolated traveller John Thornton to give up drinking), but seeing as how some of the situations Michael Green’s script calls for would be near impossible with an actual dog – animal-on-animal violence, human-on-animal violence, the drastic weather conditions of the icy Canadian setting – the CGI decision, distracting as it may be, makes sense; plus, following the backlash A Dog’s Purpose managed when footage of its animals being mistreated went public, The Call of the Wild ‘s decision is all the more sound.
At parts, it feels more like A Dog’s Purpose film than the gritty wilderness tale of London’s original book.
And we wouldn’t have movies like Old Yeller, Marley & Me and A Dog’s Purpose without it.
Much has already been made about the decision to make heroic dog protagonist Buck an FX creation, and although this means that a flesh-and-blood mutt doesn’t have to be lengthily and expensively trained, and PETA (People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals) didn’t condemn the finished product (as they did with, for example, A Dog’s Purpose ), it also results in Buck never looking like he’s actually there .
The family-friendly adventure is the latest in a recent run of movies with a canine protagonist, which includes “A Dog’s Purpose,” “A Dog’s Way Home,” and “The Art of Racing in the Rain.”