While inevitable comparisons will be made with Robert Eggers’ The Witch (2015), it’s more spiritually akin to Peter Brunner’s Luzifer (2021). But Agnes is a protagonist who behaves inversely to the victims we often see in films like this because she’s pious–an innocent. Whereas the rebellious young women in The Crucible engage in behavior which instigated a witch hunt, Agnes turns inward, seeking self annihilation.
Early on, Franz and Fiala’s new film recalls Robert Eggers’ The Witch, despite being set more than a century later, in 1750. It has a comparable emphasis on ambience and authentic historical detail, which is possibly even more granular here. But vague suggestions of witchcraft quickly turn out to be misleading, with the story instead fueled by converging forces of religion, folklore and nature.
The Devil’s Bath operates according to the tenets of folkloric horror, but doesn’t feature anything remotely fantastical outside Agnes’ fever dreams. Whereas Robert Eggers’ The Witch molds olden tales of oppressively religious teachings into outright horror imagery, The Devil’s Bath remains grounded and earthly.
The dense, swampy landscape and gloomy aesthetic of The Devil’s Bath serve well to enhance the film’s narrative tension, comparable to the cinematography of Robert Eggers’ The Witch. Nature at the beginning of the film seems friendly, as we see Agnes joyfully weaving flowers into her wedding headpiece and playing with an insect. The forest appears more sinister, however, as Agnes becomes emotionally detached.
From the film’s harrowing opening scene, immediately invoking the austere natural beauty and historical accuracy of Robert Eggers’ The Witch, we see the dire consequences of this troubling view on salvation.