Less patently, the novel has echoes of The Consequences of Love (04), his curiously revisionist take on the male-friendship-exalting French-style noir or polar, and a morbid fascination with the type of dreary provincial “non-places” featured in The Family Friend (06) and This Must Be the Place (11).
Paolo Sorrentino’s follow-up to This Must Be The Place is an alternately elegiac and world-weary cinematic fresco of contemporary Rome that references both the melancholy hedonism of La Dolce Vita or Fellini’s Roma and the decadence of the latter days of the Roman empire.
As with “ Il Divo ” and “ This Must Be the Place ,” Sorrentino continues to tackle major topics using an extraordinary combination of broad brushstrokes and minute detail.
After losing the plot somewhat with his American road movie This Must Be the Place , Paolo Sorrentino returns to the more familiar territory of Felliniesque Roma, a city in which glamour and grotesquerie dance cheek-to-cheek, caught eternally between heaven and hell, between the convent and the Coliseum.
I’ve always been partial to the baroque, crazily exuberant imagination of Italian director Paolo Sorrentino, even when his films are as infuriatingly undisciplined as his last, the self-consciously oddball road movie This Must Be The Place (11).
It was directed by Paolo Sorrentino , whose last big-screen adventure was “This Must Be the Place,” an English-language story about a goth musician (Sean Penn, Kabukied up to look like Robert Smith from the Cure) who, after the death of his father, a Holocaust survivor, comes out of self-imposed exile to become a Nazi hunter .