For years now, Tim Burton has made a comfortable living off the art of revamping someone else's ideas and giving them his own stamp: "Planet of the Apes," "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory," "Alice in Wonderland" and, most recently, "Dark Shadows."
Charlie and the Chocolate Factory marks Tim Burton's second remake (following Planet of the Apes), and to call this an improvement is quite an understatement.
Working with his frequent screenwriting collaborator John August ( Dark Shadows Charlie and the Chocolate Factory ), Burton has expanded the original story to incorporate a fond, frantic homage to monster-movie mayhem.
He lost his sense of joy during the years he churned out the reconstituted “Planet of the Apes,” “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory” and “Dark Shadows.”
It is a tad shameless for two separate projects from the same director borrowing so heavily from one another, and even worse that one"Edward Scissorhands"led to a bittersweet, beautifully poetic ending, and the other inferior one leads directly into the fatal error that ruins the pic's lasting impression.In adapting a 30-minute short into an almost 90-minute feature, screenwriter John August (2005's " Charlie and the Chocolate Factory ") has wandered too far away from what "Frankenweenie" should be about: a simple, touching love story between a boy and his dog.
The mechanical, commercial Burton of Alice in Wonderland or Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is not visible at all here, and that alone is a reason to celebrate; it's too early, of course, to call it a sustained return to form, but the warped energy of the earlier, better Burton, complete with a nastily black sense of humor for a Disney-released family movie (cat lovers will be especially traumatised), hasn't been this prominent in a long time, and it is a keen reminder for those of us who used to love the man, just what it is that made us love him.