Unlike, say, the 1998 "Armageddon," in which entire cities were slaughtered just to move the sleeping giant of a plot around, most of the catastrophes here are as carefully engineered by Mr. Amiel and his crew as those episodes of "The A-Team," which started out soothing viewers with the announcement that no one had been hurt during the stunts.
Recent "end of the world" movies, like Armageddon and Deep Impact, were memorable for little more than being loud, and the trailer for this movie makes it look like it's cut from the same cloth.
It regurgitates the genre’s clichés until the point where it becomes Armageddon , but without that dud’s insipient American jingoism, macho posturing and crappy Aerosmith songs.
El filme, dirigido por el bastante pasable Jon Amiel (La Emboscada, Sommersby), cumple perfectamente con los parámetros de las películas de desastres que tanto auge tuvieron a mediados de los 50 (como representaciones simbólicas del miedo estadounidense al comunismo y las consecuencias de la Guerra Fría) y a finales de los 90 (con el miedo inherente al mentado cambio de milenio que, supuestamente, traería una serie de calamidades para la humanidad), de las cuales algunos ejemplos van desde El Dïa Que Paralizaron La Tierra (The Day The Earth Stood Still, 1951) hasta Terremoto (Earthquake, 1974), Día de la Independencia (Independence Day, 1996), Tornado (Twister, 1997) o Armageddon (1998).
Every film requires a certain degree of "suspension of disbelief", but films like "Armageddon", "The Core", and other disaster flicks all present realistic scenarios then try to get you to buy science that even a 5th grader could tell you is bogus.
The Core is probably betting that people are more fatigued by the Riefenstahl-ian "embedded" live coverage of our troops in action than by their over-familiarity with this kind of Armageddon /Deep Impact/Poseidon Adventure falderal, when the truth is that it's possible to be tired of both.